|
Nick說明為什麼設計不用直推的原因,因只有英文版,看的懂得先看,我稍後再翻譯。我從不知道有這些原因,有趣!
Just about every part of the frames and head on the e700 were specifically designed for the best performance in regards to having a very true flying helicopter. With the new bell crank ratios, the cyclic has the feel of a direct CCPM head, in regards to tight and responsive, but a very linear and true total CCPM span as well. It is possible to get +-16 degrees collective with no cyclic interactions up to 14 degrees cyclic on top of collective... of course this would not be totally realistic but this proves the geometry will be very true during all realistic cyclic/collective combinations, as 3D styles are changing there is a lot of combined pitch/cyclic inputs for the 45 degree maneuvers...even set maneuvers like the Big Ben in which you are having to do a lot of cross controlling, you won't have to compensate for those interactions... I can assure you a direct link system will not provide that. While you may be able to reach this travel, the interactions induced will not make it worth it, nor make your inputs completely linear. The benifits of this are very noticeable in flying. Hauling butt down the field at full pitch, adding forward cyclic, the model will actually have enough pitch to reach the demanded rates |
上一篇:E700組裝注意下一篇:GOBLIN 500 Limited Edition
|